Home Education Why are the Stakeholders against the New National Education Policy?

Why are the Stakeholders against the New National Education Policy?

Framing of National Education Policy 2020 will be remembered as a shining example of participative governance. I thank all those who have worked hard in the formulation of the NEP 2020. May education brighten our nation and lead it to prosperity.

Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India

The new National Education Policy (NEP), 2020 which was approved by the Union Cabinet on Wednesday, evoked mixed reactions from academicians as well as political leaders. While some welcomed the move, saying that it will make education more full-fledged, others argued that it would pave the way for privatization. In response to the National Education Policy (NEP), student and teachers’ bodies have released statements terming the new education policy as ‘anti-democratic’.

Why so?

A few points of concern remain. These include:

  • The emphasis on mother tongue : Mother tongue as the language of instruction till fifth grade, which if brought into effect, might infringe the autonomy of parents.
  • English as optional till Class 8: This comes a greater cost eventually all formal and informal documents may be multilingual.
  •  Examinations only in Classes 3, 5 and 8 : Examinations are not just for checking a student’s potential, but a touchstone — a check and a preparation for education.
  • Colleges question remain unclear : It may also force all universities and colleges to become multidisciplinary, while their potential for such transition remains unclear.
  • Implementation: The question is whether these recommendations will be implemented even if NEP 2020 is a good document, its implementation may be restricted due to political and bureaucratic hostility.

Stakeholder Criticism:

national education policy
Student Federation of India on its twitter handle with caption as ” Drop is not the option”
  • The Delhi University Teachers Association (DU TA) has said the National Education Policy will “dismember” universities by transferring the power over to a board of governors.
  • Krantikari Yuva Sangathan (KYS) has said that the policy advocates ‘informalization’ of education.
  • The Student Islamic Organisation (SIO) has called the policy “anti-federal, anti-constitutional, and a license to commercialize education in India”.It also said that the creation of “centralized” bodies proposed in the policy is “against the federal structure of the constitution as education comes under the ambit of both the central and state governments
  • SFI in its official statement said “People from various walks of life demanded that such an education policy not be implemented and that more extensive discussions and consultations be held. Ignoring all that, the Union Cabinet has taken advantage of an extraordinary situation and passed the new education policy”
  • At the same time, politics on the topic has been having
  • The draft of New National Education Policy (NEP) was put out in the public domain seeking suggestions from all stakeholders, mainly academia, the teaching community, and the students. In addition, many intellectuals had also sent in their observations. None of these have been considered,” veteran CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury said.
  • While Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has also called the new national education policy (NEP) “a step in the right direction”, he stated that its implementation would remain a challenge.
national education policy
Trending image from SFI on NEP 2020.

Conclusion:


There is no doubt that the new National Education Policy is historic on many counts. The reforms suggested by the Narendra Modi government are those that many people used to only dream about. But the question is, whether these recommendations will be implemented.

Overall, my worry is the NEP showcases a strong tendency towards centralisation, high aspiration w/low feasibility,& an unspoken assumption that much of the challenge will be met by the private sector, which will drive up costs & make many opportunities unaffordable for the poor.

MP Shashi Tharoor

This article is written by Mahima Rathod and edited by Rupreet Kaur Dhariwal.

Must Read

Modernisation

We all have seen our grandparents and at times even our parents telling us about how they used to live back then....

Analysis Of Mergers and Acquisitions of Company

Acquisition and merger mostly occur when two companies agree to join their forces together. Both terms are often used interchangeably although there...

ICRC and Its Legality in War Crimes

RulesDefinition of War Crimes Rule 156.

Collaborative Law

Meaning of Collaborative Law Communitarian law is an option in contrast to a...

Related News

Modernisation

We all have seen our grandparents and at times even our parents telling us about how they used to live back then....

Analysis Of Mergers and Acquisitions of Company

Acquisition and merger mostly occur when two companies agree to join their forces together. Both terms are often used interchangeably although there...

ICRC and Its Legality in War Crimes

RulesDefinition of War Crimes Rule 156.

Collaborative Law

Meaning of Collaborative Law Communitarian law is an option in contrast to a...

Income Tax Act

Prologue to Personal Assessment Act, 1961 In India, Personal assessment is a duty you pay to the administration...